| |

November 4, 2002 Information
Security Issues have become one of the highest priorities of the Bush
administration. In September the White House rolled
out a national strategy for information security. Some of the measures
provide best practices for companies which are to be complied
with
on a voluntary basis. No company, large or small can afford not
to have an "InfoSec" policy in place and adhered to.
For those companies which fail to do so it is only a matter of
time
before they wish they had. It is a fact that Security breaches,
both internal and external, are largely preventable.

505 IT Consulting Jobs Available

This below article is
the first of a four part series dealing with "InfoSec". The second
installment of this series will focus on mistakes that lead to
ineffective information security. Policy management:
enforcement and audit will be discussed.
Joseph A. Gendron is the President and CEO of Surrex Solutions
Corporation. He has been active in the IT consulting and staffing
industry for 20 years and is considered a leading knowledge source
in the field.
He can be reached at "jgendron@surrex.com"
The following editorial, written by Dale McNulty, the Chief Security
Officer of eTegra moves us down the path of understanding this critical
component to your company's well being.
Management's Role in Information Security - The 7 Top Mistakes
Part 1 By Dale McNulty
Let's face it. Security breaches, both internal and external, are
largely preventable. What's more, breaches that aren't prevented
can be contained, thereby minimizing cost and damage. And yet, according
to the yearly CSI/FBI surveys, incidents and costs continue to increase
every year. Where are we going wrong?
Surveys by Verisign, The Sans Institute and others consistently
chronicle what is probably obvious to most InfoSec professionals
but has not yet permeated the collective mind of the rest of industry:
mistakes are the root of the problem and they occur at all levels
of the organization.
These surveys invariably divide the blame up across the organization,
crediting management, IT staff and users without prioritizing
the blame. This paper is the first in a series that focuses specifically
on the role of management because management has primary, ultimate
and legal responsibility for information security across the
organization.
The series delineates the most "popular" management mistakes
and what can be done in order to avoid security breaches and
minimize
escalating costs. The focus here is on the single, most significant
factor contributing to ineffective information security. Following
articles chronicle other mistakes in the approximate order of
importance.
1. Management fails to establish a sound, written
security policy, communicate it throughout the organization and
support it. The very foundation of effective information security
is a comprehensive, written security policy tailored to the needs
of the organization. Every other element of security is derived
from policy and management's support of it. Procedures and guidelines
are derived from policy. Enforcement is enabled by policy. Liability,
both corporate and personal, is mitigated by policy. Policy helps
establish roles and responsibilities within the organization and,
as such, helps IT and management coordinate and understand each
other.
The importance, role and nature of policy are frequently misunderstood.
Policy is the first and highest level of specification. It
defines
strategy or direction and embodies concepts that are to be
achieved but it does not define how to achieve them. The "how to" is
specified by procedures and guidelines that are derived from
policy. Once
policy is established, somebody must establish the operational
procedures and guidelines that will drive the organization
in
its day to day operations.
While policy is essential, there is effectively no policy unless
management demonstrates support for it. Management must understand
the importance of policy and instill that regard throughout the
entire organization. One of the most effective ways to demonstrate
support for policy is to educate every person, regardless of the
person's position, about security and security policy. The benefits
of education go well beyond simply increasing policy awareness
throughout the organization. The importance of effectively communicating
policy to the organization is threefold.
a) The organization's personnel can not be held responsible for
their actions unless it can be demonstrated that they were aware
of the policy prior to any enforcement attempts. Simply exposing
people to policy is probably not enough either. Thorough training
accompanied by testing is the best way to demonstrate that people
are truly aware.
An effective policy is a living document, changing periodically.
Those changes need to be communicated to the organization. Additionally,
it is the nature of most people to get lethargic, especially regarding
abstract ideas such as security policy. Therefore, education and
testing should be renewed frequently. We recommend classes and testing
at least 3 times a year.
Another way of communicating and supporting policy is by incorporating
it throughout the organization. For example, parts if not all of
security policy should be incorporated into HR documents such as
the employee manual/handbook. Once again, however, simply placing
the statements in the handbook is not sufficient. How many employees
actually take time to understand the contents of their employee
manual? We recommend testing people on the handbook contents.
b) Education helps mitigate corporate and personal liability. While
the fact of organizational liability is slowly being understood
and accepted by corporate America, the reality of personal liability
has not yet begun to sink in. In fact, U.S. computer crime law specifies
penalties of up to $290M and jail time for the person or persons
responsible for any security breach that compromises data. Adequate,
written security policy communicated to the organization effectively
builds the case that management has done what it has to do to establish
information security throughout the organization, thereby mitigating
corporate and personal liability.
c) Benefits of educating the organization go even further. It has
been demonstrated that security training not only raises security
awareness across the organization and increases the effectiveness
of security safeguards; it reduces fraud and abuse of the entire
computing infrastructure and increases the ROI on the organization's
investment in security as well as the investment in computing infrastructure
in general.
Policy is not only the starting point for effective information
security; effective policy is ubiquitous throughout the organization.
Properly managed, policy can not only help secure the organization
but can also help mitigate corporate and personal liability, minimize
abuse of computing resources and increase ROI on the security and
infrastructure investment.
Dale McNulty is Chief Security Officer of eTegra, a managed
security outsource company providing policy, independent audit, education,
intruder preparation/detection computer forensics. He has been active
in the computer industry for more than 25 years and is considered
a leading knowledge source in the field.
|